Distinguishing deceptive from non-deceptive speech
نویسندگان
چکیده
To date, studies of deceptive speech have largely been confined to descriptive studies and observations from subjects, researchers, or practitioners, with few empirical studies of the specific lexical or acoustic/prosodic features which may characterize deceptive speech. We present results from a study seeking to distinguish deceptive from non-deceptive speech using machine learning techniques on features extracted from a large corpus of deceptive and non-deceptive speech. This corpus employs an interview paradigm that includes subject reports of truth vs. lie at multiple temporal scales. We present current results comparing the performance of acoustic/prosodic, lexical, and speaker-dependent features and discuss future research directions.
منابع مشابه
Automatic detection of deceptive opinions using automatically identified specific details
Distinguishing deceptive opinions — that is, fabricated views disguised to be genuine — from honest opinions is a hard problem. Deceptive opinions can include things like the false expression of a controversial opinion, a misleading review of an item or service bought online, or deceitful interviews. Unlike many tasks involving language, detecting deceptive opinions through text alone turns out...
متن کاملInvestigating the Acoustic Characteristics of Deceptive Speech
This study explored the changes in the speech signal when people were being deceptive. Truthful, deceptive and control speech was elicited from ten speakers during an interview setting. Results are presented on parameters including f0, intensity and vowel formant frequencies. A significant correlation could not be established for any of the acoustic features. As well as providing a basis for fu...
متن کاملProsodic Cues and Answer Type Detection for the Deception Sub-Challenge
Deception is a deliberate act to deceive interlocutor by transmitting a message containing false or misleading information. Detection of deception consists in the search for reliable differences between liars and truth-tellers. In this paper, we used the Deceptive Speech Database (DSD) provided for the Deception sub-challenge. DSD consists of deceptive and non-deceptive answers to a set of unkn...
متن کاملHuman Detection of Deceptive Speech
We report a perception study in which judges attempted to label as deceptive or truthful the recorded interviews of the ColumbiaSRI-Colorado Corpus of deceptive speech. In general, judges performed very poorly at the task, scoring on average worse than chance. We use these results to contextualize ‘current best’ machine learning performance on this corpus. In addition, we report strong findings...
متن کاملComputational Analysis of Lexical and Cohesion Differences in Deceptive Language: The Role of Accordance
In this study, two advanced computational text analysis tools were used to catalogue lexical and cohesive features of deceptive language and language accordance (i.e., agreement/disagreement on topic of conversation) in a corpus of dyadic conversations. The study specifically focused on how the variable of accordance conditions the process of deception in terms of lexical and cohesive features....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005